RAID Best Practices for VMware: VMware RAID Best Practices and Storage Design

Choosing the right RAID setup is critical for VMware ESXi. RAID affects how fast your virtual machines run, how safe your data is, and how easily you can recover from disk failures. Not all RAID levels are equal: some focus on speed, others on redundancy, and some try to balance both.

This article explains which RAID options work best for VMware, what trade‑offs to expect, and how to match RAID levels to your workload.

Executive summary: how RAID impacts VMware stability and performance

1. 1. VMware performance depends on predictable latency, not peak throughput. ESXi workloads demand consistent response times; spikes or delays destabilize clusters faster than raw bandwidth can compensate.
2. 2. RAID choice directly affects VM behavior.

• Poor RAID levels trigger VM stun events under heavy I/O.
• They slow down snapshot operations, hurting backup and recovery.
• They extend rebuild times, leaving clusters exposed to cascading disk failures.

1. 3. Wrong RAID breaks clusters faster than CPU or RAM shortages. Compute bottlenecks are recoverable; unstable storage is not. RAID is the foundation of VMware stability.

How VMware ESXi actually uses storage

Random I/O, not sequential workloads

• VMFS generates mixed random reads and writes.

VMware’s Virtual Machine File System (VMFS) is designed to host multiple VMs simultaneously. Each VM issues its own independent I/O requests, which combine into a highly random pattern. Unlike traditional workloads that stream sequential reads/writes, ESXi storage sees fragmented access across many small blocks.

• Snapshots multiply write amplification.

When snapshots are active, every write is redirected through copy‑on‑write logic. This means a single VM write can trigger multiple backend operations: updating metadata, writing new blocks, and preserving old ones. The more snapshots you stack, the heavier the amplification, which magnifies latency and stresses parity RAID.

• Databases and VDI punish parity RAID.

Database workloads and Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) environments generate constant small random writes. On RAID 5/6, each write requires parity calculation and multiple disk operations. This overhead turns parity RAID into a bottleneck, causing unpredictable delays and degraded VM responsiveness.

Why latency consistency matters more than IOPS

• ESXi scheduling depends on storage response time.

VMware’s CPU scheduler expects storage to respond within predictable timeframes. If disk latency spikes, the hypervisor stalls VM execution, leading to pauses or “stun” events. Even high IOPS numbers don’t help if latency is uneven.

• RAID rebuilds cause latency spikes that trigger VM pauses.

When a disk fails, RAID rebuilds flood the array with parity calculations and background I/O. This competes with VM traffic, introducing unpredictable delays. In parity RAID, rebuilds can last hours or days, during which latency spikes repeatedly disrupt VM scheduling. The result: VM freezes, failed snapshots, and cluster instability.

VMware ESXi workloads are random, latency‑sensitive, and snapshot‑heavy. RAID levels that rely on parity (RAID 5/6) struggle under these conditions, while mirror‑based or stripe‑mirror designs (RAID 1, RAID 10) deliver the predictable latency VMware needs.

Best RAID configuration for VMware by workload type

General-purpose virtualization hosts

RAID 10 as the baseline standard.

For mixed workloads, RAID 10 delivers the most balanced combination of performance, rebuild safety, and predictable latency.

Why RAID 10 works here:

• Striping improves throughput for read‑intensive VMs.
• Mirroring ensures fast rebuilds and minimizes downtime after disk failures.
• Latency remains consistent, avoiding VM stun events common with parity RAID.

RAID 10 should be the default choice for general ESXi clusters where workload diversity demands stability above all.

Databases and transactional VMs

RAID 10 only.

Databases and transactional systems generate heavy random writes. RAID 5/6 introduces parity overhead that slows down commit operations and snapshot handling.

Why parity RAID fails here:

• Each write requires multiple disk operations for parity calculation.
• Snapshot consolidation becomes painfully slow under parity RAID.
• Latency spikes disrupt transaction consistency and VM scheduling.

RAID 10 eliminates parity penalties, ensuring reliable performance for mission‑critical transactional workloads.

VDI and high-density VM environments

RAID 10 or RAID 6 with a large cache and SSD tiering.

VDI boot storms and high‑density VM activity generate massive random I/O. RAID 10 remains the safest option, but RAID 6 can be viable if paired with enterprise‑grade caching and SSD acceleration.

Requirements for RAID 6 in VDI:

• Large write cache to absorb random writes.
• SSD tiering to offload hot data and reduce parity overhead.
• Battery‑backed cache protection to prevent data loss during power events.

RAID 10 is preferred, but RAID 6 can be acceptable in cost‑sensitive deployments if cache and SSD tiering are properly implemented.

RAID levels for VMware ESXi: what works and what fails

RAID 10 — VMware’s safest choice

• Fast rebuilds. Mirrored pairs allow quick recovery after a disk failure, minimizing downtime.
• Predictable latency. Striping spreads I/O across disks, while mirroring avoids parity overhead, ensuring consistent response times.
• Survives disk failures during load. RAID 10 can tolerate multiple disk failures (one per mirror set) without collapsing the datastore, keeping VMs stable even when stressed.
• Bottom line: RAID 10 is the gold standard for VMware ESXi, balancing performance, resilience, and reliability.

RAID 5 — acceptable only in narrow scenarios

• Read‑heavy workloads. RAID 5 can deliver decent performance when workloads are primarily reads with minimal random writes.
• Flash‑backed controllers. Write caching can mask parity penalties, but only with enterprise‑grade controllers.
• Small VM counts. With limited concurrency, RAID 5 may be viable, but scaling quickly exposes its weaknesses.
• Bottom line: RAID 5 is a compromise. Use it only for light, read‑centric workloads where cost savings outweigh risk.

RAID 6 — capacity over performance

• Archive VMs. Suitable for cold storage or rarely accessed virtual machines.
• Backup repositories. Works for secondary datastores where throughput matters less than capacity.
• Long rebuild times increase risk. Dual parity protects against two disk failures, but rebuilds are slow and latency spikes can stun VMs.
• Bottom line: RAID 6 is about maximizing space, not performance. Avoid it for production workloads with heavy I/O.

RAID 0 — never for ESXi datastores

• No fault tolerance. RAID 0 offers speed but zero redundancy.
• A single disk failure destroys VMFS. One failed drive wipes the entire datastore, taking all VMs with it.
• Bottom line: RAID 0 is unacceptable for VMware ESXi. It belongs only in test labs where data loss is irrelevant.

RAID rebuild behavior and VMware risk

Why RAID rebuilds break VMware clusters

• Latency spikes cause VM stun.

During a rebuild, disks are saturated with background I/O. VMware ESXi depends on predictable latency; when response times spike, the hypervisor pauses VMs, leading to stun events and degraded performance.

• Snapshots may fail.

Snapshot creation and consolidation require steady write performance. Rebuild overhead disrupts these operations, causing snapshot failures or extended consolidation times that impact backup and recovery workflows.

• HA events increase.

VMware High Availability (HA) interprets prolonged VM pauses as failures. Latency spikes during rebuilds can trigger unnecessary HA restarts, compounding instability across the cluster.

Design rules to survive rebuilds

• Limit disk size.

Large disks extend rebuild times, increasing the window of risk. Smaller, enterprise‑grade drives reduce rebuild duration and minimize exposure.

• Prefer mirror‑based RAID.

RAID 10 and RAID 1 rebuild faster and with less latency impact compared to parity RAID. Mirroring avoids parity calculations, keeping latency predictable during recovery.

• Maintain hot spares.

Automatic rebuilds to hot spares shorten the time arrays spend in degraded mode. This reduces the risk of a second disk failure and stabilizes VMware workloads during recovery.

RAID misconfigurations that cause data loss

Common real‑world failures

• RAID 5 with large SATA disks.

Using RAID 5 with multi‑terabyte SATA drives creates unacceptably long rebuild times. The chance of a second disk failure during a rebuild is high, often leading to complete array loss.

• RAID 6 under heavy write load.

While RAID 6 protects against two disk failures, its parity overhead collapses under sustained random writes. In VMware environments, this causes latency spikes, VM stun events, and eventual datastore corruption.

• Expanding arrays without backups.

Adding disks or expanding RAID groups without a verified backup introduces risk. Controller errors or rebuild interruptions during expansion can destroy VMFS volumes instantly.

VMFS corruption scenarios

• Power loss during rebuild.

If power fails mid‑rebuild, incomplete parity calculations leave the array in an inconsistent state. VMFS metadata is especially vulnerable, leading to unrecoverable corruption.

• Controller firmware bugs.

Outdated or unstable RAID controller firmware can mishandle rebuilds or parity writes. These silent errors often surface as VMFS corruption long after the initial event.

• Incomplete disk replacement.

Replacing a failed disk incorrectly — or with mismatched firmware/geometry — can confuse the RAID controller. This results in partial rebuilds, broken parity, and corrupted VMware datastores.

VMware RAID failure and recovery considerations

When VMware can no longer mount VMFS

• Broken RAID metadata.

If RAID metadata is corrupted or lost, the controller can no longer present a consistent array to VMware. VMFS volumes become inaccessible, even if most disks are intact.

• Inconsistent stripe layout.

Misaligned or partially rebuilt stripe sets confuse VMware’s storage layer. ESXi expects predictable block mapping; when stripes are inconsistent, VMFS cannot mount and data access fails.

• Partial rebuild damage.

Interrupted or incomplete rebuilds leave arrays in a degraded state. VMware interprets this as corrupted storage, preventing VMFS from mounting and risking permanent data loss.

RAID recovery options

• Software‑level RAID reconstruction before physical repair.

Specialized tools can reconstruct RAID arrays logically, bypassing controller errors. This is often safer than attempting hardware fixes first.

• Example: DiskInternals RAID Recovery.

Tools like DiskInternals can detect RAID parameters, rebuild arrays virtually, and recover VMFS volumes without altering source disks.

• Manual RAID parameter detection.

In cases where metadata is lost, RAID parameters (stripe size, order, parity layout) must be identified manually. Correct detection allows virtual reconstruction of the array.

• VMFS volume recovery.

Once the RAID is reconstructed, VMFS structures can be scanned and restored. This enables access to virtual machine files even if the original array is unusable.

• Read‑only operation on source disks.

Recovery should always be performed in read‑only mode to prevent further corruption. Source disks must remain untouched until data is safely extracted.

RAID design checklist for VMware administrators

Before deployment

• Define workload I/O profile.

Identify whether workloads are random or sequential, read-heavy, or write‑intensive. This ensures RAID selection matches actual VMware demands.

• Choose RAID for rebuild safety, not capacity.

Prioritize predictable rebuilds and latency stability over maximizing usable space. RAID 10 should be the default baseline for ESXi.

• Validate controller cache protection.

Ensure the write cache is battery‑backed or flash protected. Without cache protection, parity RAID risks data loss during power events.

Before production

• Test disk failure scenarios.

Simulate drive loss and measure rebuild impact on VM latency. Confirm that workloads remain stable under degraded conditions.

• Validate backup restores.

Perform full restore tests from backups to confirm recovery paths. RAID alone is not a substitute for verified backup integrity.

• Document RAID layout.

Record stripe size, disk order, and controller settings. Documentation speeds recovery in case of controller failure or array reconstruction.