RAID Recovery™
Recovers all types of corrupted RAID arrays
Recovers all types of corrupted RAID arrays
Last updated: Apr 12, 2024

RAID vs. backup: differences and benefits

In the world of data protection and storage, distinguishing between RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) and traditional backup solutions is essential for preserving the integrity and availability of your critical data. This article explores the fundamental differences between these two approaches, highlighting their unique functions, benefits, and limitations.

RAID is often mistakenly regarded as a backup solution. However, its primary function is to improve data reliability and performance through redundancy. By spreading data across multiple disks, RAID provides protection against hardware failure but does not guard against data corruption, user errors, or disasters that could impact all drives simultaneously.

Conversely, backups involve creating copies of data that are stored separately from the original data. These copies are designed to be retrieved in the event of data loss, corruption, or disasters. Backups can be incremental, recording only changes made since the last backup, or full, capturing all data at a specific time.

This article will delve into:

  • The Nuances of RAID Levels: Understanding different RAID configurations and their respective applications.
  • Limitations of RAID as a Backup: Why RAID alone is insufficient for comprehensive data protection.
  • Backup Strategies: Discussing incremental and full backups, along with their advantages in data recovery scenarios.
  • Implementing a Data Protection Strategy: How to integrate both RAID and backups into a robust strategy to ensure maximum data security.
  • Common Misconceptions: Clarifying the distinct roles of RAID and backups to prevent costly misunderstandings.

What is RAID?

RAID (Redundant Array of Independent Disks) is a technology that combines multiple physical disk drive components into one or more logical units for the purposes of data redundancy, performance improvement, or both. It was initially termed as Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks but now more commonly stands for Redundant Array of Independent Disks. Data is distributed across the drives in one of several ways, referred to as RAID levels, depending on the required level of redundancy and performance.

The main RAID levels include:

  • RAID 0 (Striping): This level splits data evenly across two or more disks with no redundancy, offering improved performance but no fault tolerance. If one drive fails, all data in the array is lost.
  • RAID 1 (Mirroring): Data is copied identically to two or more drives, providing high fault tolerance. The read performance can improve since data can be read from multiple disks, but write performance will be similar to a single disk.
  • RAID 5 (Striped with Parity): This level distributes parity along with the data and requires at least three disks. It provides a good balance of performance, storage capacity, and fault tolerance. If one drive fails, the data can be reconstructed from the parity and remaining data.
  • RAID 6 (Striped with Double Parity): Similar to RAID 5, but RAID 6 can withstand two simultaneous drive failures. It requires at least four disks and provides greater fault tolerance at the expense of some storage capacity and write performance.
  • RAID 10 (1+0): This level combines RAID 1 and RAID 0, providing both redundancy and improved performance. It requires a minimum of four disks.

Each RAID level offers different trade-offs in terms of data availability, fault tolerance, cost, and performance. Choosing the right RAID level depends on the specific needs and goals of the data storage environment.

It's also important to note that while RAID can protect against hardware failure, it is not a substitute for data backup. Even with RAID, data should be backed up regularly to a separate location to protect against data corruption, virus attacks, disasters, and other forms of data loss.

Is RAID a backup?

No, RAID is not a backup. While RAID technology provides redundancy and can protect against certain types of hardware failures, it does not constitute a backup system. Here are the key reasons why RAID is not considered a backup:

  • Data Corruption: If data on one drive becomes corrupted, this corruption can be automatically replicated across other drives in the array, especially in RAID levels that use mirroring or parity. A backup system, on the other hand, can store multiple versions of data, allowing you to restore data from a point in time before the corruption occurred.
  • User Errors: Accidental deletion or modification of files will be instantly mirrored or striped across the RAID array, with no way to undo those changes without a separate backup.
  • Malware and Ransomware: If a system is compromised with malware or ransomware, the malicious changes can be propagated across the RAID array. A separate, secure backup can allow you to restore the system to a pre-infected state.
  • Catastrophic Events: RAID does not protect against site-specific disasters like fire, flood, or theft. Backup systems, especially offsite or cloud-based backups, ensure that data is stored in a different physical location and is protected against such events.
  • Single-Point Failures Beyond Drives: RAID protects primarily against drive failures. However, other components of the storage system, like controllers or the RAID array itself, can also fail, potentially affecting all drives simultaneously.

In summary, while RAID can enhance data availability and system uptime by allowing for the failure of one or more disks without data loss, it does not replace the need for regular backups. Backups ensure that data can be recovered from a different point in time and are essential for comprehensive data protection against a broader array of data loss scenarios.

Why you might need RAID

Implementing RAID can be beneficial for various reasons, depending on the specific needs and goals of your data storage strategy. Here are some key reasons why you might need RAID:

  • Improved Data Reliability and Fault Tolerance: RAID can protect against data loss due to hardware failure. By mirroring data across multiple disks (RAID 1) or using parity information (RAID 5 or RAID 6), RAID allows a system to continue operating even if one (or in the case of RAID 6, two) disks fail.
  • Enhanced Performance: Certain RAID levels, such as RAID 0, improve data read/write speeds by distributing the data across multiple drives, allowing simultaneous access and increased throughput. This can be particularly beneficial for applications that require high data transfer rates or reduced latency.
  • Increased Storage Capacity: RAID can be used to pool together multiple drives, creating a larger, unified storage space. While RAID 0 achieves this by striping data across all disks, other RAID levels provide varying balances of capacity and redundancy.
  • Data Availability: For critical systems that require constant uptime, RAID can ensure that data remains accessible even in the event of a disk failure. This is crucial for servers and systems where downtime can lead to significant productivity loss or financial impact.
  • Cost-Effective Redundancy: While not a substitute for a comprehensive backup solution, RAID provides a relatively cost-effective way to mitigate the risk of data loss due to hard drive failure. It can be particularly cost-effective for protecting against hardware failures in environments where downtime or data loss would be costly.
  • System Performance Balancing: In environments where it's essential to balance load and optimize performance, RAID configurations can be tailored to optimize read and write operations, benefiting overall system performance and user experience.

It's important to choose the right RAID level based on your specific needs regarding redundancy, performance, and capacity. The selection would typically depend on the criticality of the data, the performance requirements of the system, and the acceptable level of risk. Regardless of the RAID level chosen, it is crucial to maintain regular backups as RAID does not protect against all forms of data loss, such as accidental deletion or corruption.

What type of RAID can you use?

There are several types of RAID configurations, each designed to meet different needs in terms of redundancy, performance, and storage capacity. Here's an overview of the most commonly used RAID levels:

  • RAID 0 (Striping): This level splits data evenly across two or more disks without redundancy, enhancing performance but offering no fault tolerance. If one drive fails, all data in the array is lost. RAID 0 is best suited for non-critical storage where speed is the primary objective.
  • RAID 1 (Mirroring): RAID 1 duplicates the same data on two or more disks. It provides high fault tolerance and improved read speed but does so at the cost of halving the total storage capacity. If one disk fails, the system can continue to operate using the other disk(s). It is ideal for critical data requiring high availability.
  • RAID 5 (Striped with Parity): RAID 5 spreads data and parity information across three or more disks. It offers a good balance between high capacity and reliability, allowing the system to withstand a single drive failure without data loss. Upon a drive failure, data recovery is possible using the parity information, though this can be a slow process.
  • RAID 6 (Striped with Double Parity): Similar to RAID 5, RAID 6 uses two parity blocks instead of one and can survive the loss of up to two disks. It requires at least four disks and is suitable for systems where data availability and fault tolerance are critical, albeit with a higher cost in usable storage capacity compared to RAID 5.
  • RAID 10 (1+0): This level combines the features of RAID 1 and RAID 0. It mirrors data across pairs of disks and then stripes across these pairs. RAID 10 requires a minimum of four disks and provides high performance and fault tolerance but at the expense of using only half of the total disk capacity for storage.
  • RAID 50 (5+0) and RAID 60 (6+0): These are nested RAID configurations that combine the features of RAID 0 with RAID 5 or RAID 6, respectively. They offer improved performance and fault tolerance by striping data across multiple RAID 5 or 6 sets. These configurations are suitable for large storage environments that require a balance of performance, capacity, and redundancy.
  • RAID 0+1 and RAID 1+0: Although they are often confused, these are distinct configurations. RAID 0+1 creates two striped arrays and then mirrors them, while RAID 1+0 mirrors individual drives first and then stripes across them. Both offer a mix of performance and redundancy but have different implications for data recovery and array rebuilds.

The choice of RAID level depends on the specific requirements for data availability, fault tolerance, performance, and cost. Additionally, it is important to consider the RAID controller's capabilities, as not all hardware supports all RAID levels. Regardless of the RAID level chosen, it is essential to maintain regular backups, as RAID is not a substitute for data backup.

RAID 0 (data striping)

RAID 0, also known as data striping, is a RAID configuration that divides and writes data evenly across two or more hard drives or solid-state drives without redundancy. This setup aims to increase the system's overall storage performance by utilizing the combined throughput of multiple drives. Here are the key aspects of RAID 0:

  • Performance Increase: RAID 0 enhances both read and write performance by allowing multiple drives to work in parallel. Since data is split into blocks and each block is written to a separate drive, the data operations can be carried out simultaneously, effectively doubling (or more, depending on the number of drives) the performance compared to a single drive.
  • No Redundancy or Fault Tolerance: RAID 0 does not provide any data protection. If any drive in the array fails, all data is lost because the data is distributed across all disks. The failure rate increases with the number of disks in the array because if any single disk fails, the whole array fails.
  • Capacity Utilization: RAID 0 maximizes storage efficiency since there is no overhead for redundancy. The total capacity of the RAID 0 array is simply the sum of all drives in the array.
  • Use Cases: RAID 0 is ideal for situations where performance is the primary concern and data loss is not a critical issue or can be mitigated through other means. It is often used for editing and streaming large video files, gaming, and any application requiring high bandwidth.
  • Implementation: Setting up RAID 0 can be done through hardware RAID controllers or software RAID solutions. Hardware RAID typically offers better performance, while software RAID is more flexible and cost-effective.
  • Recovery: In the event of a drive failure, data recovery is not possible from the RAID 0 array itself. Therefore, regular backups are crucial to prevent data loss.

RAID 1 (data mirroring)

RAID 1, known as data mirroring, is a RAID configuration that duplicates the same data across two or more drives. This setup is designed to provide fault tolerance and improve read performance. Below are the key characteristics and considerations for using RAID 1:

  • Fault Tolerance: RAID 1 is highly fault-tolerant because it creates an exact copy of all data on two or more disks. If one disk fails, the system can continue to operate seamlessly using the other disk(s), which contain identical copies of the data. Once the failed disk is replaced, data from the surviving disk(s) can be mirrored again to restore the redundancy.
  • Read Performance Improvement: RAID 1 can offer improved read performance. Since identical data resides on multiple disks, the system can read from all disks in parallel, potentially doubling the read speed (or more, depending on the number of mirrors). However, this benefit often depends on the RAID controller's ability to balance read requests efficiently.
  • Write Performance: The write performance of a RAID 1 array is generally the same as that of a single disk. Every write operation must be carried out on all disks, so the write speed does not improve with RAID 1.
  • Storage Efficiency: RAID 1 is not efficient in terms of storage capacity. Since data is duplicated across all disks, the effective storage capacity is only that of a single drive, regardless of the number of drives in the mirror. For example, two 2TB drives in RAID 1 provide only 2TB of usable storage.
  • Rebuild Times: When a failed drive is replaced, the data from the surviving disk must be copied to the new disk, which can take time depending on the size and speed of the drives. However, since the data is mirrored exactly, the system can remain operational during the rebuild.
  • Use Cases: RAID 1 is ideal for applications where data availability and integrity are critical, such as servers hosting critical applications, small databases, or any system where data must be protected against single-disk failures.
  • Cost Considerations: Because RAID 1 requires at least two disks to store a single disk's worth of data, it is less cost-effective in terms of storage capacity. The trade-off is the increased data protection and potentially improved read performance.
  • Implementation: RAID 1 can be implemented through hardware RAID controllers, which may provide additional features and better performance, or through software RAID, which can be more flexible and easier to manage depending on the environment.

RAID 5 (data striping and parity)

RAID 5 is a popular RAID configuration that offers a balance of good performance, efficient storage utilization, and fault tolerance. It requires at least three disks to implement and provides redundancy by distributing parity information across all the disks in the array. Here are the key features and considerations of RAID 5:

  • Data Striping with Parity: RAID 5 stripes both data and parity information across three or more drives. This setup allows the system to reconstruct data in case of a disk failure using the parity information stored across the remaining disks. The parity information for any given block of data is placed on a different drive, ensuring that no single disk holds all the parity or data.
  • Fault Tolerance: RAID 5 can withstand the failure of one drive without losing data or access to data. In the event of a drive failure, the system can continue to operate in a degraded mode while the data from the failed drive is reconstructed on a new drive using the parity information.
  • Storage Efficiency: RAID 5 offers better storage efficiency than RAID 1. In a RAID 5 array, the total storage capacity is the sum of the capacities of all the disks minus the capacity of one disk. For example, in a setup with three 2TB drives, the total available storage would be 4TB.
  • Performance: RAID 5 provides improved read performance due to data striping, as multiple blocks of data can be read from multiple drives simultaneously. However, write performance can be impacted due to the overhead of calculating and writing parity information. The exact performance impact depends on the RAID controller and the workload.
  • Write Penalty: The RAID 5 write penalty refers to the extra operations required to update both the data and the parity information, which can affect write performance, especially in environments with heavy write activity.
  • Rebuild Times: Rebuilding a RAID 5 array after a disk failure can be time-consuming, especially for large drives, as it requires reading all data and parity information from the remaining drives to reconstruct the missing data. During the rebuild, the array operates in a degraded mode, and performance may be reduced.
  • Use Cases: RAID 5 is well-suited for file and application servers, non-critical back-end storage, and environments where both storage capacity and fault tolerance are important but where the highest level of performance is not critical.
  • Considerations for Large Drives: With large-capacity drives, the time to rebuild a RAID 5 array can be significant, increasing the window of vulnerability to a second drive failure, which would result in data loss. RAID 6 or RAID 10 might be recommended for arrays using large drives to mitigate this risk.
  • Implementation: RAID 5 can be implemented via hardware RAID controllers, which may include features like battery-backed cache for improved performance, or through software RAID, which can be more flexible and cost-effective but might not offer the same performance as hardware RAID.

RAID 10 (data striping and mirroring)

RAID 10, also known as RAID 1+0, combines the features of RAID 1 (mirroring) and RAID 0 (striping) to provide both high performance and data redundancy. It requires a minimum of four disks to set up and is often used in environments where both speed and data integrity are critical. Here's a detailed look at RAID 10:

  • Data Mirroring and Striping: In RAID 10, data is mirrored between pairs of drives (RAID 1) and then striped across those pairs (RAID 0). This configuration offers the redundancy of mirroring along with the increased performance of striping.
  • Fault Tolerance: RAID 10 provides excellent fault tolerance. As long as one drive in each mirrored pair is functional, data is safe. Even if multiple drives fail, as long as they are not within the same mirrored pair, the array remains operational.
  • Performance: RAID 10 offers superior read and write performance. The striping aspect (RAID 0) allows for faster data access since operations can be divided across multiple striped pairs. Mirroring (RAID 1) does not inherently improve write performance but does enhance read performance since the system can read from multiple mirrors simultaneously.
  • Storage Efficiency: The trade-off for the increased reliability and performance of RAID 10 is storage efficiency. Because it duplicates every piece of data, RAID 10 effectively halves the total available storage capacity. For example, with four 2TB drives, RAID 10 provides only 4TB of usable storage.
  • Rebuild Times: Rebuilding a degraded RAID 10 array is typically faster than rebuilding RAID 5 or RAID 6 arrays because the system only needs to copy data from the surviving mirror, not calculate and rebuild data from parity information. This reduces the rebuild time and the window of vulnerability to additional drive failures.
  • Use Cases: RAID 10 is ideal for critical applications requiring high performance and maximum uptime, such as database servers, high-traffic web servers, and any environment where both speed and data integrity are crucial.
  • Cost Considerations: RAID 10 is more expensive in terms of disk usage compared to other RAID levels like RAID 5 or RAID 6 because it requires twice as many drives for the same amount of usable storage. However, the cost may be justified by the need for performance and redundancy.
  • Scalability: Expanding a RAID 10 array can be more complex and costly than other RAID configurations. Adding additional storage typically requires adding two drives at a time (to maintain the mirroring and striping), which may not be as scalable or cost-effective as other RAID levels.
  • Implementation: RAID 10 can be implemented through either hardware RAID controllers, which offer optimized performance and reliability, or software RAID, which can be more flexible and easier to configure based on the system's needs.

Should you use RAID for backups?

Using RAID as a sole backup solution is not recommended because RAID, while it provides redundancy for hardware failures, does not protect against many common data loss scenarios. Here are key points to consider when evaluating RAID's role in a backup strategy:

  • Data Corruption and User Errors: RAID cannot protect against data corruption, accidental deletions, or overwrites. If data is corrupted or erroneously deleted on one drive, the error is automatically replicated across all drives in the array.
  • Malware and Ransomware: RAID arrays are vulnerable to malware and ransomware attacks. If your system is compromised, the malicious software can affect all data across the RAID array, leaving no untouched version to revert to.
  • Physical Disasters: RAID does not protect against site-specific risks such as fires, floods, or theft because all drives in an array are typically located in the same physical location. If a physical disaster strikes, it could destroy the entire array, regardless of its RAID level.
  • Backup vs. Redundancy: RAID should be considered a part of a broader data availability and redundancy strategy, not a backup solution. True backups involve storing data independently of its original system and location, allowing for recovery in various failure scenarios.
  • Versioning: Backup solutions often provide versioning capabilities, allowing you to restore data from specific points in time. RAID arrays do not offer this; they only maintain the current state of your data.
  • Legal and Compliance Considerations: Depending on your industry, there may be regulatory requirements to maintain offsite backups or to retain data for a certain period. RAID, being an onsite redundancy solution, does not fulfill such requirements.

Best Practices:

  • Use RAID for Redundancy: Implement RAID to ensure system uptime and data availability, particularly for mission-critical operations where hardware failure cannot afford downtime or data loss.
  • Implement Offsite Backups: Use offsite or cloud backups to ensure that you have another copy of your data that is geographically separated from the original. This is crucial for disaster recovery.
  • Regular Backups: Regularly back up data according to a defined schedule and retain multiple versions or snapshots to protect against data corruption or accidental deletion.
  • Test Your Backups: Regularly test your backup and restore processes to ensure that data can be effectively recovered when needed.

RAID is not a Backup

In conclusion, while RAID technology provides redundancy and enhances performance, it is essential to understand that RAID is not a substitute for a backup solution. RAID configurations are designed to protect against hardware failures, particularly hard drive crashes, by allowing a system to continue operating and maintaining data accessibility even when one or more drives fail (depending on the RAID level used). However, RAID does not safeguard against several critical data loss scenarios:

  • User Error: RAID cannot protect against accidental deletion or modification of files by users. If data is deleted or altered on a RAID array, those changes are instantly reflected across all drives.
  • File Corruption: RAID does not guard against file corruption. Corrupted data will be mirrored or striped across the array, compounding the problem.
  • Malware and Ransomware: In the event of a malware or ransomware infection, RAID offers no protection. Such infections can spread across the network and affect all data stored on the RAID array.
  • Physical Disasters: RAID arrays are susceptible to site-specific disasters like fires, floods, or thefts, which can simultaneously destroy all drives in the array.
  • Backup Versatility: Unlike RAID, proper backup solutions enable you to store multiple versions of files, allowing you to roll back to earlier versions if necessary. Backups can also be stored off-site or in the cloud, ensuring that they are not subjected to the same risks as the original data.

In light of these considerations, it is clear that RAID and backups serve different purposes. RAID is best utilized for increasing uptime and data accessibility, acting as a first line of defense against hardware failure. In contrast, backups are essential for comprehensive data protection, enabling data recovery following user errors, corruption, malware attacks, and other data loss incidents.

To ensure data integrity and continuity, organizations and individuals should employ both RAID and regular, reliable backup solutions. Backups should be performed frequently, stored securely off-site or in the cloud, and tested regularly for integrity. By understanding the limitations of RAID and the critical importance of backups, users can implement a balanced approach to data protection that mitigates risk and ensures data resilience against a variety of threats.


  • What is the best type of RAID for backup?

    As the most widely adopted RAID configuration, RAID 5 strikes a balance between redundancy and performance. With RAID 5, you can utilize a minimum of three drives and up to a maximum of sixteen. In this setup, data blocks are striped across the drives, with distributed parity providing fault tolerance.

  • Is RAID 5 or 6 better for backups?

    In RAID 5, the system can withstand the failure of a single drive without experiencing any data loss. Conversely, RAID 6 offers even greater resilience by allowing for two drive failures without compromising data integrity. Notably, RAID 5 typically boasts faster rebuild times compared to RAID 6, often ranging from 50% to 200% quicker. However, rebuild speeds can vary based on factors such as capacity, the RAID controller used, and the volume of data being reconstructed.

  • Should I use RAID 0 or RAID 1 for backup?

    RAID 1 operates as a mirrored configuration, where every NVMe drive maintains a complete copy of the other. In the event of a drive failure, the system can seamlessly continue operation due to redundancy. Conversely, RAID 0 functions as a striped setup, with each NVMe drive containing only a portion of the data. Consequently, if one drive fails, the entire system fails, resulting in the loss of all data.

  • Which RAID is fastest with backup?

    RAID 0 delivers the highest read/write speeds and provides access to the maximum available raw storage capacity.

  • Is RAID 10 a replacement for backups?

    Even though RAID 10 writes data simultaneously to two disks, it should not be viewed as a substitute for conventional data backup methods. In the event of operating system corruption, both disks' data could be vulnerable to corruption.

Related articles

FREE DOWNLOADVer 6.20, WinBUY NOWFrom $249

Please rate this article.
51 reviews