RAID in cloud storage systems — Software-defined storage with RAID & virtual RAID arrays in the cloud
RAID in cloud storage systems is essential for data redundancy and fault tolerance, transforming traditional methods into more resilient solutions. This article examines how Software-Defined Storage (SDS) and Virtual RAID innovate cloud infrastructures. By exploring Erasure Coding, we highlight advancements in data reliability and storage efficiency. As businesses lean heavily on cloud technology, mastering these concepts is crucial for optimizing storage strategies. Discover how these innovations are shaping the future of data management in the cloud.
Executive Summary
Cloud systems have evolved beyond relying solely on classic on-server RAID, integrating its core principles like striping, parity, and mirroring into virtual arrays. In modern cloud environments, resilience is achieved through advanced techniques such as erasure coding, data replication, and distribution across multiple Availability Zones (AZs), ensuring both scale and high availability. Utilize Software-Defined Storage (SDS) with RAID-like configurations for robust, predictable protection at the node level. For global efficiency and fault domain tolerance, erasure coding stands out as the preferred method, offering a balance between reliability and storage efficiency across vast cloud infrastructures.
Key Takeaways
✔️SDS and Virtual RAID for Local Control: Leveraging Software-Defined Storage (SDS) with virtual RAID configurations allows for tailored control over how individual nodes or localized failures are managed. This setup offers predictable rebuild strategies and ensures data integrity without compromising system performance. By virtualizing RAID, storage systems gain flexibility and can be adapted to meet specific workload requirements, allowing for dynamic scalability and resource allocation.
✔️Erasure Coding for Scale and Resilience: In the pursuit of enhanced cross-rack and cross-region data resilience, erasure coding proves invaluable. This method significantly increases storage efficiency while maintaining high levels of data redundancy. It is particularly effective in large-scale systems where spreading data across multiple geographic locations is essential for disaster recovery and high availability. When combined with replication strategies, it maximizes both data protection and storage utilization.
✔️Classic RAID in Bare-Metal Deployments: Despite advancements in cloud-based solutions, classic RAID setups continue to have a place in the deployment of cloud VMs or databases on bare-metal hardware. Many cloud service providers still offer access to traditional RAID levels on bare-metal instances to accommodate specific performance, redundancy, or compliance needs. Classic RAID can be particularly beneficial for enterprises with specific workload environments that require the old-style control and performance metrics.
At-a-glance comparison — RAID, SDS, erasure coding in cloud
| 🔎 Concern | Local RAID / Virtual RAID (SDS) | Erasure Coding (object layer) | Replication (multi-AZ) |
| 🔒 Fault domain | Protects node or node group | Protects across nodes/racks/regions | Protects across AZs/regions |
| 📦 Capacity efficiency | Moderate (parity mirrors) | High (k-of-n schemes) | Low (full copies) |
| ⚡ Performance | Good for local IO, predictable | Higher CPU overhead, optimized for throughput | Read performance good, write cost high |
| 🔧 Operational model | Controlled by storage software (vdevs, policies) | Managed at object layer (storage service) | Simple but costly; easy recovery |
| ✅ Best when | You control nodes/HW (SDS, HCI) | Large-scale object stores, cost efficiency | RTO/RPO across failures, simple availability |
How Cloud Providers Use RAID Concepts
🔸Bare-metal & VM Hosts
Cloud providers utilize RAID concepts in their bare-metal and virtual machine offerings to address specific needs related to redundancy and performance. These providers allow customers to configure RAID levels on bare-metal instances, which means direct access to traditional RAID setups like RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 5, and so on. This flexibility is crucial for customers aiming for high-performance computing environments or those needing to meet stringent data redundancy requirements.
On virtual machine disks, providers expose local RAID configurations, effectively allowing VMs to benefit from enhanced data redundancy and performance. By integrating RAID functionalities at the host level, users can optimize their systems for specific tasks such as database management or application hosting that demand high I/O throughput and low latency. This is especially advantageous in environments where on-host data protection is crucial without relying entirely on cloud-side redundancy.
🔸Software-Defined Storage (SDS)
Software-Defined Storage platforms like Ceph, GlusterFS, and MinIO bring RAID-like capabilities into the virtual domain. These systems employ virtual devices (vdevs) and organize storage using placement groups, which are collections of objects and data placements that can dynamically adapt to changing resource requirements. In this setup, local parity and mirroring policies are applied to efficiently handle node failures and streamline the rebuild process, ensuring data availability and integrity.
SDS solutions accomplish this by abstracting physical disk drives into large, flexible pools of storage. Instead of being constrained by the limitations of physical RAID arrays, SDS allows for the application of RAID configurations or erasure coding as policies. These policies dictate how data is distributed, protected, and retrieved across the cloud architecture, promoting resilience and scalability in response to growing data demands.
🔸Object Stores & Erasure Coding
Object storage services such as Amazon S3 and OpenStack Swift prefer advanced methods like erasure coding and data replication over traditional RAID for achieving cross-region durability and cost efficiency. Erasure coding is particularly favored because it offers robust data protection while minimizing storage overhead. It works by dividing data into fragments, expanding and encoding it with redundant pieces, and dispersing it across different locations or nodes.
This approach provides the ability to tolerate multiple simultaneous failures without requiring a complete duplication of data, as seen in traditional mirroring approaches. For large-scale cloud environments, erasure coding ensures data reliability while enabling significant storage savings, making it an essential tool for maintaining efficiency in vast, distributed storage systems. This strategy reduces costs while maximizing data availability, aligning with the scale and flexibility demands of modern cloud infrastructures.
RAID vs. Erasure Coding in the Cloud — Detailed Tradeoffs
🔹Durability & Failure Model
RAID, including virtual implementations, is traditionally designed to provide data protection against failures within a specific, localized failure domain, such as individual disks or nodes. This protection is achieved through techniques like mirroring or parity, which can effectively manage failures without extending beyond the immediate environment. In contrast, erasure coding offers a more robust protection model, designed to handle failures across broader domains such as entire racks or regions. With configurable parameters like k/n tolerances, where k is the number of data fragments and n is the total number of fragments including parity, erasure coding can tailor resilience levels to match significant geographic or infrastructure challenges, offering resilience that scales with cloud ecosystems.
🔹Performance & Rebuild Behavior
RAID rebuilds tend to place a significant burden on local I/O operations, often prolonging degraded periods, especially with large-scale drives. This results in increased vulnerability to additional failures during the rebuild window. To mitigate such drawbacks, modern Software-Defined Storage (SDS) systems have been designed to throttle rebuild operations, ensuring minimal impact on performance. Meanwhile, erasure coding offers an advantage in this context, as its rebuilds more effectively manage data traffic by limiting cross-system I/O and reducing the strain traditional RAID places on local disks, providing a smoother, less disruptive recovery process.
🔹Cost & Efficiency
When aiming for high data durability with minimal storage overhead, erasure coding emerges as the optimal solution. It efficiently uses storage by distributing data and parity across multiple nodes, thus reducing duplicate data storage compared to RAID's mirroring approach. However, in scenarios where low latency and straightforward I/O patterns are critical, such as specific enterprise or high-performance computing scenarios, local RAID configurations, notably mirroring, might be more advantageous. This option often results in quicker data access times and simpler system architectures, catering to environments where immediate data retrieval and straightforward setup are prioritized.
Software-Defined Storage with RAID — Patterns and Implementations
🔸Virtual RAID Arrays (vdevs) Inside SDS
In Software-Defined Storage (SDS), the concept of virtual RAID arrays, or vdevs, plays a pivotal role. These vdevs can be configured as mirrors or parity groups and are used to organize storage pools. This flexible architecture allows administrators to tailor storage configurations based on specific workload demands, choosing between mirrored configurations for enhanced redundancy and quick access, or parity setups for more efficient use of storage space while maintaining data protection. By strategically placing data across these virtual environments, administrators can fine-tune the balance between performance and resilience in accordance with their storage requirements.
🔸Hybrid Designs (Replication + Erasure Coding + Local RAID)
In pursuit of a comprehensive balance between cost, performance, and recovery time, hybrid storage designs have emerged within SDS frameworks. These designs typically employ a combination of replication, erasure coding, and local RAID. For "hot" data—frequently accessed and requiring quick read/write capabilities—local mirroring offers rapid retrieval and redundancy. Erasure coding is applied to "cold" or object data, where storage efficiency and durability are key concerns. Meanwhile, replication is often chosen for safeguarding critical metadata, ensuring its availability even in the face of widespread system disruptions. This layered approach ensures that each type of data is stored using the most appropriate method, optimizing the overall storage strategy for different application needs and budget constraints.
🔸Controller & Orchestration Roles
At the heart of SDS systems, controllers and orchestration tools provide the intelligence necessary for efficient storage management. These components, which include software controllers and placement engines, are responsible for executing the "virtual RAID" logic that keeps the system running smoothly. They handle tasks such as rebalancing data across the network to optimize performance and storage use, repairing data after failures, and enforcing policies that dictate how data is stored and accessed. By automating these complex processes, SDS controllers ensure that storage systems remain resilient, adaptable, and efficient, providing a seamless experience for users and administrators alike.
Virtual RAID Arrays in the Cloud — Design Checklist
1️⃣Define Failure Domains
- Clearly detailing the failure domains is a foundational step in designing virtual RAID arrays in the cloud. These domains dictate how data protection measures are applied and specify the geographical and infrastructural scope within which failures need to be contained and managed.
- Node-Level: This involves strategies to handle failures confined to individual storage nodes. RAID configurations at this level can quickly manage disk failures without affecting the entire network.
- Rack-Level: At this level, redundancy strategies account for potential failures across all nodes within a single rack. It requires configurations that can handle multiple simultaneous node failures within the rack, often involving more complex RAID or erasure coding setups.
- Availability Zone (AZ): For geographic resilience, failure domains that span entire Availability Zones ensure data remains accessible even if an entire data center becomes inoperative. This might involve data replication across different zones, each treated as an isolated failure domain.
2️⃣Choose Parity vs Mirror Based on Workload
- Mirroring: Ideal for workloads demanding low latency and high-speed access. Mirroring creates exact duplicates of data, ensuring that if one copy is compromised, another is instantly available. It is best for transaction-heavy databases or real-time applications requiring immediate access.
- Parity & Erasure Coding: Use these for workloads where capacity efficiency is vital, and slightly increased read/write latencies are acceptable. Parity splits data across drives, providing protection at the cost of extra parity data, which can be rebuilt if a failure occurs. Erasure coding offers a more sophisticated solution by spreading data across numerous locations with a mix of data and parity, allowing for effective recovery processes without consuming a disproportionate amount of storage space.
3️⃣Plan Rebuild and Throttle Policies
- Establishing efficient rebuild and throttle policies is critical for minimizing the impact of recovery processes on system performance.
- Rebuild Policies: These determine how quickly and extensively systems respond to failures. Swift rebuild processes can reduce vulnerability windows but might stress server resources.
- Throttle Policies: Implement throttling to manage the load that rebuild processes impose on system resources. By controlling the rate of rebuild operations, systems can maintain a balance between recovery speed and performance impact, preventing degradation of service quality during failure recovery operations.
4️⃣Ensure Monitoring and Automated Repair
- Monitoring Systems: Implement comprehensive monitoring tools that continuously assess the health of the storage infrastructure. This involves tracking metrics such as I/O performance, error rates, and system logs to preemptively identify and address potential issues.
- Automated Repair: Enable automated repair mechanisms such as regular scrubs and integrity checks to ensure data consistency and integrity. These processes can detect and correct minor data errors before they escalate into significant issues. Automation in repair processes reduces the need for manual intervention, thereby increasing the efficiency and reliability of the storage system.
Cloud Provider RAID Alternatives & Managed Options
🔹Managed Block Storage (EBS, Persistent Disks)
Cloud providers offer managed block storage solutions such as Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) and Google Cloud Persistent Disks, which abstract the complexities of traditional RAID configurations. These managed volumes employ internal mechanisms like replication and erasure coding to ensure data redundancy and reliability without exposing the intricate details of RAID to users. Providers typically offer various performance tiers, allowing users to tailor storage options to specific workload requirements, such as high IOPS for intensive applications or efficient storage for less demanding needs. To make informed decisions, it is advisable to consult provider documentation, which outlines the performance characteristics and best practices for aligning managed storage offerings with organizational or project-specific requirements.
🔹Bare-metal RAID and Provider Exposed RAID Levels
For cloud services that offer bare-metal instances, providers often support traditional RAID configurations, allowing users to select from common RAID levels such as 0, 1, 5, or 6 for local disk setups. This approach is particularly beneficial for applications that demand predictable, on-host performance and greater control over storage architecture. Whether optimizing for speed, redundancy, or a balance of both, bare-metal RAID provides the consistency and reliability crucial for high-performance environments. Users can configure RAID on these platforms according to specific data protection and performance goals, facilitating a fine-tuned storage strategy that leverages classic RAID benefits alongside cloud capabilities.
Failure & Recovery: RAID Recovery in Cloud/SDS Environments
🔹Why Recovery Differs in Cloud vs On-Prem
In cloud and Software-Defined Storage (SDS) environments, the recovery process is inherently different from traditional on-premises setups. When a failure occurs in a cloud environment, data recovery often involves rebuilding data structures across distributed network architectures, which can introduce delays in the recovery process due to the complexity and scale involved. Unlike on-premises recovery, which generally focuses on straightforward disk-level operations, cloud recovery must consider metadata distribution and elaborate placement policies that dictate how data is stored across various nodes and locations. These additional layers of abstraction can complicate the recovery process, requiring sophisticated algorithms and comprehensive orchestration to effectively manage data redundancy and availability during rebuild operations.
🔹Software-First Recovery & Tools
In cases where SDS or virtual RAID metadata is compromised or a controller malfunctions, software-first recovery approaches can be invaluable. Non-destructive reconstruction tools are designed to handle these scenarios by detecting the underlying array layout and allowing administrators to preview files before initiating recovery. A prime example is DiskInternals RAID Recovery, a tool adept at reconstructing arrays even when metadata is lost. It can intelligently assess and rebuild RAID structures, offering a practical solution for recovering valuable data. To enhance the success rate of such recoveries, it is advisable to create disk or volume images whenever possible, providing a safeguard that preserves the data integrity and serves as a reliable foundation for recovery actions. This approach minimizes risk, ensuring that even in complex or distributed environments, data can be restored efficiently and with minimal data loss.
Ready to get your data back?
To start recovering your data, documents, databases, images, videos, and other files from your RAID 0, RAID 1, 0+1, 1+0, 1E, RAID 4, RAID 5, 50, 5EE, 5R, RAID 6, RAID 60, RAIDZ, RAIDZ2, and JBOD, press the FREE DOWNLOAD button to get the latest version of DiskInternals RAID Recovery® and begin the step-by-step recovery process. You can preview all recovered files absolutely for free. To check the current prices, please press the Get Prices button. If you need any assistance, please feel free to contact Technical Support. The team is here to help you get your data back!
Comparison table — SDS RAID patterns vs cloud erasure coding
| 📊 Pattern | Protection domain | Efficiency | Best for | Recovery complexity |
| Local RAID (mirror/parity in SDS) | Node / node group | Moderate | Low-latency VMs, DBs | Moderate (controller knowledge needed) |
| Erasure coding (k/n) | Cross-rack / region | High | Object stores, large archives | Higher (reconstruction math + network traffic) |
| Replication (full copies) | AZ / region | Low | Critical metadata, instant failover | Low (simple copy promote) |
Operational Best Practices — Runbooks & SRE Checklist
1️⃣Model Failure Domains and Set Placement Rules
Begin with a comprehensive understanding of your infrastructure by modeling failure domains, which could include individual nodes, racks, or entire data centers. Establish placement rules that dictate how data is distributed across these domains. This strategy ensures that data is adequately protected and managed according to the specific risks associated with each type of failure domain. Effective placement rules help in maintaining data availability and integrity across diverse network segments.
2️⃣Run Automated Scrubs and Background Repair Tasks
Implement automated scrubbing and repair processes as part of regular maintenance to ensure data integrity. These tasks are crucial for identifying and correcting data errors or discrepancies before they escalate into significant issues. Automated scrubs should be scheduled to run at intervals that balance thoroughness with system performance, providing a safety net that keeps your data healthy and reliable.
3️⃣Use Throttled Rebuilds to Protect Front-End IO
Throttled rebuild strategies are essential for maintaining system performance during recovery operations. By controlling the rate at which data is rebuilt, you can prevent the overconsumption of resources that would otherwise impact user-facing I/O operations. This ensures that the system remains responsive and efficient while still engaging in necessary recovery processes.
4️⃣Keep Metadata Backups and Export Placement Maps Periodically
Maintain up-to-date backups of all metadata, which includes configuration settings, access permissions, and data placement maps. Regularly exporting and securely storing these maps is critical for quick restoration in the event of data loss or corruption. These backups serve as a roadmap for recreating the environment or troubleshooting issues, thereby minimizing downtime and facilitating smoother disaster recovery efforts.
5️⃣Test Disaster Recovery and Cross-Region Restores Regularly
Conduct regular testing of your disaster recovery plans and cross-region restore capabilities to ensure they function correctly when needed. These tests should simulate real-world failure scenarios to validate the effectiveness of your recovery strategies, helping to identify potential weaknesses or areas for improvement. Regular testing not only verifies procedural readiness but also instills confidence that systems can recover swiftly and reliably in the face of disruptions.