Encrypting RAID arrays — RAID with full disk encryption & secure RAID configuration

What You Must Know First

Encrypting RAID arrays ensures data-at-rest protection but alters recovery, key management, and operational processes. The encryption layer choice is crucial:

• Above RAID (filesystem/LUKS): Offers simpler recovery at the cost of potential performance impacts.
• Below RAID (self-encrypting drives, controller): Provides seamless protection with faster boot times but can complicate recovery and portability.

Quick Decisions

• Prioritize Recoverability and Flexibility: Build RAID first, then encrypt the RAID device using LUKS/dm-crypt or the filesystem on top.
• Focus on Performance and Transparent Encryption: Opt for certified self-encrypting drives (SEDs) or controller-backed encryption, but ensure vendor metadata and recovery paths are verified.
• Plan Key Management Carefully: Losing encryption keys leads to irreversible data loss. Always secure backup keys and regularly test restore procedures.

Encryption placement & tradeoffs

Common Deployment Patterns & Recommended Order

Pattern A — RAID → LUKS → Filesystem (Recommended for Most)

This architecture starts by creating a RAID array using tools like mdadm for software RAID or ZFS's vdev for more robust setups. Once the RAID array is established, LUKS/dm-crypt is layered on top to encrypt the data before it reaches the file system.

✅Pros:

• Portability: The entire RAID volume is encrypted, allowing for easier transfer across systems without re-encrypting.
• Recoverability: Since the RAID array sits below the encryption layer, if any drive physically fails, you can replace it and rebuild the array without affecting the encrypted data layer.
• Simplicity: The process is straightforward and well-supported by community resources and documentation.

❎Cons:

• Key Dependency: Recovery depends entirely on having access to the encryption keys. Proper key management is crucial to avoid data loss.

Pattern B — LUKS on Physical Disks → RAID on /dev/mapper (Less Common)

In this less common approach, each disk in the array is encrypted individually with LUKS. The operating system then assembles a RAID array out of these decrypted mappings, which appear as regular devices.

✅Pros:

• Per-Disk Keys: Each disk can have its own encryption key, enhancing security granularity.
• Independent Disk Handling: Individual disks can be transported or replaced with their data intact once decrypted.

❎Cons:

• Complex Key Management: Managing keys for multiple disks increases complexity significantly.
• Boot Complications: Additional steps are required during the boot process to open each encrypted disk before assembling the RAID array.
• Performance Overhead: This setup might introduce a performance overhead due to the multiple layers of encryption and decryption operations.

Pattern C — ZFS Native Encryption (Dataset-Level)

ZFS offers built-in encryption capabilities that allow datasets to be encrypted transparently as part of its storage management.

✅Pros:

• Integrated Encryption: ZFS handles encryption as part of its storage management, including built-in key management and seamless rollback/replication.
• Advanced Features: Works seamlessly with ZFS's other features like snapshots and clones.

❎Cons:

• Replication Considerations: If datasets are encrypted, replication processes need to handle keys securely, and there may be constraints on what operations can be performed on encrypted datasets.
• Key Management Complexity: Although integrated, proper management and security of keys are vital to avoid unintended data access issues.

Pattern D — Hardware Encryption / SEDs

This involves using self-encrypting drives (SEDs) which support the Opal or SCSI Security protocols, or employing controller-level encryption solutions.

✅Pros:

• Performance Efficiency: Since encryption and decryption are handled by the drive hardware, it imposes minimal CPU load.
• Transparent to OS: The operating system interacts with the hardware as if it were unencrypted, making integration simple.

❎Cons:

• Vendor Lock-In and Recovery: Ensure that vendor-specific implementations provide robust options for data recovery and that metadata can be easily exported and transferred.
• Security Verification: It is crucial to validate claims of security and encryption standards by hardware vendors to avoid relying on potentially flawed implementations.

Performance Impact — What to Expect and How to Mitigate

CPU vs Hardware Offload

When it comes to encryption, the choice between software and hardware implementations can significantly affect performance:

• Software Encryption (e.g., LUKS/dm-crypt): This method relies on CPU cycles to perform encryption tasks. While it can introduce noticeable overhead, modern CPUs equipped with AES-NI (Advanced Encryption Standard New Instructions) can dramatically reduce the impact by accelerating encryption tasks.
• Hardware Solutions (SEDs/Controllers): Self-encrypting drives (SEDs) and certain RAID controllers offload encryption to dedicated hardware, effectively eliminating CPU usage impacts. This approach provides encryption with minimal performance overhead and is highly efficient in handling large volumes of data.

I/O Patterns Matter

The performance hit of encryption is not uniform and varies depending on I/O patterns:

• Small Random I/O: These operations can experience a higher relative performance overhead because encryption adds latency to each I/O operation. This can be more pronounced in workloads with frequent small random reads/writes.
• Large Sequential Transfers: These are generally less affected by encryption overhead because the data flows more uniformly, allowing for optimizations in handling the data stream.

To understand the real-world impact of encryption on a system, it's crucial to use tools like fio to simulate workloads and gauge performance.

Mitigations

Several strategies can help mitigate the performance impact of encryption:

• Utilize AES-NI: Ensure that CPUs with AES-NI are utilized to accelerate encryption processes. This hardware support can significantly reduce encryption overhead.
• Allocate CPU Resources: Dedicate specific CPU cores to handle encryption tasks, which can stabilize performance under load.
• Use Crypto Offload Hardware: If available, consider using dedicated hardware for encryption tasks to free up CPU resources for other operations.
• Leverage NVMe SSDs: These drives provide lower latency and higher throughput compared to traditional HDDs, helping to offset encryption overhead.
• Tune I/O Scheduler and Queue Depths: By optimizing these settings, you can enhance the efficiency of how requests are handled, reducing delays induced by encryption.

Failure Modes & Recovery Implications

Key Loss = Data Loss

When dealing with encrypted RAID arrays, the loss of encryption keys equates to the loss of all data, as the disks become unreadable without the necessary keys. It's paramount to plan for key escrow, ensuring that keys are securely backed up and accessible to authorized individuals in the event of emergency.

Controller or Metadata Problems

Hardware-encrypted arrays or those relying on controller-specific metadata present unique challenges:

If the controller fails, accessing your data can become impossible if metadata is not duplicated elsewhere.

To mitigate this, create disk images and thoroughly document controller metadata before attempting recovery. This preparation can help you transition to a new controller or recovery setup without data loss.

Software-First Recovery Workflows

In cases where RAID or metadata corruption occurs, software-first recovery is often the safest approach:

• Use non-destructive tools that can reconstruct arrays from disk images and detect RAID layout configurations.
• A tool like DiskInternals RAID Recovery can auto-detect arrays and preview recoverable files before you export them. Always work from disk images rather than original disks to prevent further data corruption during recovery attempts.

Ready to get your data back?

To start recovering your data, documents, databases, images, videos, and other files from your RAID 0, RAID 1, 0+1, 1+0, 1E, RAID 4, RAID 5, 50, 5EE, 5R, RAID 6, RAID 60, RAIDZ, RAIDZ2, and JBOD, press the FREE DOWNLOAD button to get the latest version of DiskInternals RAID Recovery® and begin the step-by-step recovery process. You can preview all recovered files absolutely for free. To check the current prices, please press the Get Prices button. If you need any assistance, please feel free to contact Technical Support. The team is here to help you get your data back!

Operational Best Practices & Policies

• Enforce Least-Privilege Access: Limit access to key stores strictly to individuals who require it for their roles. This minimizes the risk of unauthorized access and potential data breaches.
• Conduct Regular Key-Recovery Drills and Full Restores: Schedule frequent exercises to simulate key-recovery and perform full data restores from backup images. This ensures that recovery procedures are reliable and that staff are familiar with the process.
• Monitor SMART and RAID Health: Regularly check the integrity and performance of your RAID arrays and individual drives using SMART diagnostics. Schedule array scrubs while they are unlocked to detect and fix any potential issues early.
• Securely Wipe Decommissioned Drives: Follow NIST or DoD standards for data destruction after performing a crypto-erase or key revocation. This ensures that removed drives do not present a security risk by preventing unauthorized data retrieval.